Screenshot of video by: Office of the President, Ethiopia via X
Newz.Africa, Africa Desk | Addis Ababa, Ethiopia | 10 February 2026 | Ethiopia summit backlash
Public criticism intensified on X after Ethiopia’s presidency posted a message saying Africa will not be forced to choose sides. The statement came during the World Governments Summit. It promoted cooperation and shared interests. But the public reaction told a different story.

H.E. President Taye Atske-Selassie underlined that Africa will not be compelled to choose sides. And Africa’s survival depends on cooperation built on shared interests. pic.twitter.com/dK1Nwk7sEA
— Office of the President, Ethiopia (@POEthiopia) February 8, 2026
Users rejected the idea of neutrality. Their replies focused on contradictions between diplomatic statements and regional politics. The tone was sharp. The criticism was immediate. And people questioned whether Ethiopia can claim balance at all.
Public commentary on the Ethiopia summit backlash
One user mocked the message. They suggested that the government’s actions do not match its words. Another said a country of more than 130 million should not appear guided by outside actors. They argued this creates instability in nearby regions such as Somalia, Sudan, Libya and Yemen.
Other users linked the statement to domestic issues. They accused the government of harming its own citizens. They said the messaging from the summit does not reflect lived realities. Their criticism was rooted in distrust and frustration.
Another group raised concerns about foreign influence in Africa. They said the continent shifted from one set of pressures to another. Some pointed to regional dynamics stretching “from Berbera to Benshangul”. Their comments warned that political decisions carry long-term consequences.
Some commentary focused on foreign influence in Africa. One user said the continent moved from Western pressure to new external control. They named the UAE as the dominant actor. Another warned Ethiopia about supporting groups they described as terrorists. They referenced movement “from Berbera to Benshangul”. Their warning suggested that geopolitical choices have long‑term risks.
Together, these reactions form a clear pattern. People online do not view the summit message as credible. They see Ethiopia’s position as inconsistent. And they challenge the idea that the country stands outside major geopolitical alignments.
Original Reporting
Newz.Africa reviewed public replies posted directly under the official message cited in the Primary Artefact. Themes were drawn from recurring user commentary.
Yet a government in charge of 130 million people chose to become a puppet of a UAE government with a population of 2 million people to become an instrument for chaos and destruction for the people of Somali, Sudan, Libya and Yemen
— Samson Ermias (@samson_ermias) February 9, 2026
Primary Artefact
Source: Public user comments posted under an official message from the Office of the President of Ethiopia on X, dated 8 February 2026.
