<a href="https://www.flickr.com/photos/35067687@N04/52534366939" rel="nofollow">VP Kamala Harris and French President Emmanuel Macron meet at NASA HQ (NHQ202211300020)</a> by <a href="https://www.flickr.com/photos/35067687@N04" rel="nofollow">NASA HQ PHOTO</a> is licensed under <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/" rel="nofollow">CC-BY-NC-ND 2.0</a>
By Newz.Africa World Desk |Brussels, Belgium |Published: 18 January 2026. This article explores the EU anti coercion instrument and its implications for international relations.
French President Emmanuel Macron has made a call to action. He wants the European Union to activate its anti coercion instrument. This comes after US President Donald Trump threatened new tariffs on several European countries in a dispute linked to Greenland. French officials report that Macron wants EU leaders to respond collectively. He views this as a reaction to escalating economic pressure from Washington.
The threat follows Trump’s announcement of a 10 percent tariff on goods from eight European countries. These include France, Germany, the Netherlands, Denmark, and the United Kingdom. The tariffs will start on 1 February. Trump warned that tariffs would rise to 25 percent on 1 June. This will happen unless Europe agrees to allow the “complete and total purchase” of Greenland by the United States.
Anti coercion instrument could restrict US access to EU markets
The anti coercion instrument, adopted in 2023, has never been used. It allows the EU to limit a country’s access to the European market. This occurs if that country uses trade threats to force political concessions. Possible measures include blocking access to public procurement, restricting US banks from European tenders and targeting major US technology companies.
Macron believes Washington’s tariff strategy undermines the transatlantic trade arrangement agreed last year. European leaders have warned that the US measures could trigger a “dangerous downward spiral.” They described this spiral in relations between the two blocs.
EU ambassadors hold emergency talks as pressure mounts
EU ambassadors have been called to an emergency meeting in Brussels to discuss the threat and consider triggering the instrument. Leaders from Denmark, Sweden, and Finland issued a joint statement. Leaders from France and Germany also joined. Additionally, leaders from the Netherlands and the United Kingdom participated. They defended Denmark and rejected pressure linked to Greenland.
The move comes after a NATO‑linked reconnaissance visit to Greenland by several European states drew criticism from Washington. Trump insists the US must take control of the Arctic territory, which belongs to the Kingdom of Denmark. [yahoo.com]
Some European governments have signalled that ratification of the recent EU‑US trade deal will be paused until the dispute is resolved. Lawmakers expressed concern about the stability of agreements with Washington under current conditions. [rte.ie]
Original Reporting
What we confirmed
- Macron is seeking activation of the EU’s anti coercion instrument in response to Trump’s tariff threat.
- The trade tool has never been used and can restrict US access to EU markets.
- EU nations have condemned the tariff threats and held emergency meetings.
Primary artefact
- Screenshot of Macron’s adviser briefing via Bloomberg summary (Jan 18, 2026). [theedgesingapore.com]
Public Reaction on X
Early reactions on X show a divided response to Macron’s call for the EU to activate its anti coercion instrument. One user wrote that the move risks pushing Europe and the United States into a “full blown trade war.” The user argued that European leaders should focus on strengthening NATO budgets. They should also focus on cooperation with Washington.
Another user warned that a “trade blockade” could accelerate buying American goods instead of European imports. They claimed that if the EU restricts US access to its market, American producers would redirect goods domestically. As a result, prices would come down. They framed the situation as a wider economic power play.
These comments reflect early public concerns. People worry about the potential consequences of deploying the EU’s most powerful trade measure against the United States.
Also read:
About the Author
